Have cell phone. Will travel. - The director's moment [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Tom Courtney

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

The director's moment [Jun. 7th, 2009|05:17 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
[mood | surprised]
[music |outer space-Freezepop-Fancy Ultra•Fresh]

Suffice it to say that what turns the director on is going to be a bit different from what grabs the audience. By the time a show goes up, the director has seen each scene dozens of times, and the show in toto at least five or six, and so the things the audience notice on first viewing are old hat for the director.

But there are moments of quiet satisfaction, when everything just seems to click, and a sweet realization that the actors have done things well will show on the director's face. I first noticed this phenomenon when Kathryn was directing The Tempest: there was something about Prospero's last scene with Ariel that just gave her immense satisfaction. I think I have an idea of what it was, but I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out that what got me about that scene was entirely different from what floated her boat.

My moment in this production comes between Act III.2, and Act III.3. The Constable of France has the last line in III.2, walks off stage left, switches his cloak and hat, and comes back in as Bedford for the second line of III.3. There is simply no time at all for any sort of transition, and yet, when Christovau walked back on, I found the idea that he was now an English noble, instead of a French commander, totally believable.

Walk off. Walk on. Everything's different. What's not to like about that?
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: [info]negothick
2009-06-07 09:36 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Agreed. And we know you were close to real theatrical practice at the Globe, where there was massive doubling, trebling, etc. I think you did brilliantly at casting as "FEW" actors as possible for a play with so many listed speaking roles. The scholars who have worked out the doubling rules claim that "even minor actors who doubled many roles usually had a scene off-stage in which to change costumes and any actor who doubles in principal parts is off-stage for an interval of at least one full scene between roles." Well I think you proved that they DON'T need that full scene offstage, so there!
[User Picture]From: [info]herooftheage
2009-06-07 09:55 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Internally I thought of switches from male to female as "impossible costume changes" that needed at least a whole scene to do, and I thought of everything else as doable in under 10 seconds if you needed to. It was tough on the actors, but the effect was worth it, I think.

As you know, we switched the order of the elbow scene and the surrender of Harfleur so that Rhonwyn would have enough time to go from being the nurse to being Nym.


[User Picture]From: [info]learnedax
2009-06-07 11:55 pm (UTC)

(Link)

I really only noticed yesterday that Christian plays two different, and distinct, English soldiers in IV.1.
[User Picture]From: [info]marysdress
2009-06-08 12:28 am (UTC)

(Link)

I'll bite - what floated your boat about it?

My memory is a bit hazy, but I think I can conjure up enough. I have a very vivid memory of a moment that I suspect is the same scene which you are remembering. At least it probably is, because it has stuck with me all this time.
[User Picture]From: [info]herooftheage
2009-06-08 07:39 am (UTC)

(Link)

What floated my boat about it was that actions have consequences. Ariel is a bound creature of Prospero's, and yet, when he finally releases her, it's clear (at least in that show) that he developed real feelings there - and that those feelings may spark a sea-change in the way he deals with the creatures around him. It was sort of unclear up to that point whether Prospero had a better nature or not, and Ariel's release was an indication that maybe he did, though it certainly didn't hold absolute ascendency over his actions.
[User Picture]From: [info]marysdress
2009-06-08 01:39 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Very similar, although I would express it differently.

Prospero started down his current path by indulging in the unacceptable behavior of abdicating responsibility for his duties to indulge his wants. At that moment he is on the cusp of getting everything back, but in order to do it he has to let go of those wants and assume his responsibilities.

What made that moment poignant and raised it above simply moving the plot or the theme forward was the emotion they imbued in the touch, the look. It gave it depth and shading.

So I think the effect we are describing is the same, although - as you say - as the director I looked at it differently.
[User Picture]From: [info]cristovau
2009-06-08 01:18 pm (UTC)

(Link)

[info]ladysprite dubbed that the fastest costume change in the history of costume changes.

I almost regret altering my other two quick changes... ...almost.